City of Syracuse v. Utica Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Callahan, J.
The issue to be resolved on this appeal is whether an insurance company seeking reimbursement of first-party benefits it has paid must serve a notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law as a condition precedent to mandatory arbitration against a municipal self-insurer under section 674 of the Insurance Law.
This controversy arises from the Utica Mutual Insurance Company’s (Utica Mutual) claim for reimbursement from a municipal self-insurer, City of Syracuse (City), for first-party benefits paid by Utica Mutual. The essential facts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- United Nations Development Corp. v. Norkin Plumbing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Treanor v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- City of Syracuse v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Conception v. Hew Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Arbitration between the State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.