Legal Opinion
Conception v. Hew Cab Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action by Travelers Indemnity Company to recover first-party benefits paid pursuant to a policy issued by it, defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated August 22, 1984, as, upon granting their motion to dismiss the complaint, permitted Travelers to file for arbitration nunc pro tunc.
Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the provision allowing Travelers to file for arbitration nunc pro tunc is deleted.
The appropriate forum for Travelers to seek reimbursement of first-party benefits was arbitration…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Regional Transit Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- City of Syracuse v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Transamerica Insurance v. Lumbermen's Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- City of Syracuse v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Amica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Brinks, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- City of Long Beach v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007