Montgomery v. Daniels
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We hold that the New York no-fault automobile accident compensation law is not unconstitutional. This case comes to us on direct appeal (NY Const, art VI, § 3, subd b, par [2]; CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2) from a judgment at Special Term which, on cross motions for summary judgment, declared article 18 of the Insurance Law in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Federal and *46State Constitutions and a denial of the right to trial by jury guaranteed by our State Constitution.
The New York No-Fault Act
We first describe this insurance program.
Under the title,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by371 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re Philip A.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
366 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.