State v. Torres

PARKER, Judge.

In their first and second assignments of error defendants argue that the trial court abused its discretion and committed prejudicial error in denying their motions in limine which sought to prevent introduction into evidence of rings purchased by defendant Torres after the incident and in admitting the rings into evidence at trial. We disagree.

“Generally, a motion in limine seeks to secure in advance of trial the exclusion of prejudicial matter. ... In those jurisdictions which recognize the motion . . . the uniform rule appears to be that the decision whether to grant the…