State v. Ruof
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to grant his motion in limine. The thrust of the motion was to prohibit any comment regarding defendant’s association with “The Outlaws” motorcycle club. The trial judge considered the written motion and stated that he would rule on it “at the appropriate time during the course of the trial.”
Generally, a motion in limine seeks to secure in advance of trial the exclusion of prejudicial matter. North Carolina has no statutory provisions for such a motion, and it is rarely if ever used in this State. In those jurisdictions…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hoops v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.