Legal Opinion

State v. Arnette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1987No. 8613SC789PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Defendant contends that the sentencing judge erred in refusing to find and consider several statutory mitigating factors, which defendant argues were proven by a preponderance of the evidence.

A refusal to find a statutory mitigating factor supported by uncontradicted and credible evidence is reversible error. State v. Jones, 309 N.C. 214, 306 S.E. 2d 451 (1983). The defendant, however, bears the burden of proving the existence of a factor by the preponderance of the evidence and convincing the sentencing judge “that ‘the evidence so clearly establishes the fact in issue that no…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. ColvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. ArnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API