Legal Opinion
Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 24, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This case has now come back to us upon objections to the report of the Master un*315•der the rules.2 On July 29, 1940, we passed a decree, Section 24 of which, as amended by our opinion on April 3, 1941, 37 F.Supp. 917, we quote in the margin.3 Early in 1943 the “Central” filed the annual account between the roads required by Article Fourth of the Operating Agreement, to which the director of the “Peoria” who had been appointed by the Bondholders filed objections. Thereafter and on April 1, 1943, the “Central” petitioned for a supplemental order, appointing a master under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Austrian v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Pergament v. FrazerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
- Weatherby v. Weatherby Lumber CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Moses v. BurginDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.