Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Brownsville (The St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway Co.) and Tex-Mex (The Texas Mexican Railway Co.) are interstate carriers by railroad and subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act. 24 Stat. 379,41 Stat. 474,49 Stat. 543, 54 Stat. 899,49 U. S. C. § 1. On November 1, 1904, they entered into a written contract whereby, for payment of specified rentals, Tex-Mex granted Brownsville the right to operate its trains over the tracks of Tex-Mex between Robstown and Corpus Christi, Texas, and to make use of terminal facilities of Tex-Mex at Corpus Christi. The contract provided…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gardner v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.