Legal Opinion
Moses v. Burgin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 27, 1970No. Civ. A. 67-880PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION INCORPORATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WYZANSKI, Chief Judge.
I
Introduction.
This is a stockholder’s derivative action brought against a mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. secs. 80a-l et seq., (hereafter called “the Act”), its directors, its investment adviser, and its underwriter. Plaintiff alleges that she through her company has been injured by defendants’ violations of their statutory duties under secs. 1, 15, 36 and 37 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. secs. 80a-l, 15, 35 and 36, and of their non-statutory fiduciary duties.
Plaintiff’s main…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,592 Paulette Papilsky v. Alvin H. Berndt, and Carl W. KnoblochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers BurginCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Susan Tannenbaum v. Robert G. ZellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,393 Rosalind Fogel and Gerald Fogel v. George A. Chestnutt, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Weatherby v. Weatherby Lumber CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.