Legal Opinion

Sikora v. American Can Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 31, 1980No. 79-1299PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs filed suit in the district court asserting that their involuntary retirements in 1975 and 1976 before they reached the age of 65 violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621— 634 (1976)(ADEA). The court entered summary judgment for the defendant on that count but ordered a trial on other allegations of discrimination. In 1978, after entry of the summary judgment, Congress revised the ADEA to prohibit forced retirement under age 70 in most situations. Plaintiffs contend on appeal that the amendments control our…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
  5. City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bradshaw v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Cerro Metal Products v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Wehr v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API