Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrew Rodman McGahey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1971No. 71-1814_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

McGahey appeals from a denial by the District Court of his motion after imposition of sentence to withdraw his plea of guilty to five counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The motion is based on Rule 32(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. * An evidentiary hearing was held by the District Court which held that appellant’s contentions were not supported by the facts developed. He asserts that his plea was not made knowingly and voluntarily; that his plea was based on his expectation of leniency resulting from plea negotiations between his appointed attorney and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Arthur Reed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Whitney B. Christy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Walter Harris, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Holler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  4. United States v. Allen Ronald FuteralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of RhonemusCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API