Legal Opinion
United States v. Walter Harris, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 16, 1976No. 75-2956PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
After entering a plea of guilty on one of several counts pursuant to a plea bargain under which the remainder were dismissed and after being sentenced, Harris made a motion under F.R.Crim.P. 32(d) to set aside the judgment, and withdraw the plea. The district court denied the motion, and Harris appeals. We reverse.
The substance of Harris’ contention is that the “manifest injustice” standard of Rule 32(d) is satisfied, and reversal required, 1 by the court’s failure when taking the plea to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Anthony Joseph Munich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Douglas Fruchtman v. Frank Kenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Americo Michel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Donald P. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Joseph Torrey v. Wayne EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Robin F. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. EdmonsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Hipolito Rivera-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jesus Ramirez Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.