Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip Cimmino
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 27, 1976No. 75-2325PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This is another of the recurring appeals which stem from imprecise language used by the parties in the bargaining process preceding a guilty plea. Appellant Phillip A. Cimmino was charged with one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute Schedule I controlled substances and a second count of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of 470.7 grams of heroin hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A). 1 Cimmino initially pleaded not guilty to both counts, but after four and a half…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Americo Michel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Sullivan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Raymond S. Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- David Wayne Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Arch A. Moore, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.