Legal Opinion

Kerney v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 29, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In this action, plaintiff sued to partition certain lands titled to Ridgefields Center Development Company, Inc., alleging he was a tenant-in-common with the defendants Cobb and McNeil.

The chancellor granted summary judgment and plaintiff has appealed.

The chancellor, in dismissing this action, said:

There is no material issue of disputed fact before this Court. The Court finds in accordance with the proof submitted that at all times pertinent to this action, including on and after March 11, 1980, Plaintiff, as an officer, director and shareholder, and Defendants, DAVID H.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. B. Wolfe, Inc. v. SalkindSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Frederic G. Krapf & Son, Inc. v. GorsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Cloverfields Improvement Ass'n v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Morrow v. DrumwrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jesse A. Bland Co. v. Knox Concrete Products, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mayflower Restaurant Co. v. GriegoWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Loveday v. CateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Grand Valley Lakes Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. CaryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. Fairbanks Arctic Blind Co. v. Prather & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API