Legal Opinion
Fairbanks Arctic Blind Co. v. Prather & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 21, 2005No. 2004-CA-001257-MRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDDLESTON, Senior Judge.
Fairbanks Arctic Blind Company was incorporated on November 12, 1990, for the purpose of manufacturing and selling hunting blinds. The corporation quickly turned its efforts to the research and development of a process to transfer photographs onto cloth in order to produce realistic camouflage fabric; Fairbanks referred to this as its “photo-identical process”.
On May 11, 1993, Fairbanks and Douglas Prather entered into a contract in which Prather agreed to assist the corporation in developing and marketing its photo-identical process. However, prior to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- J. B. Wolfe, Inc. v. SalkindSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Kerney v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Hardin County Fiscal Court v. Hardin County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
- Joseph A. Holpuch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pannell v. ShannonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Martin v. Pack's Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
- Williams v. MARTIN LAKES CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.