Rastelli v. Zaca Mining Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside a sale of property made after foreclosure of a mortgage.
On April 1, 1939, respondent borrowed $9,000 from and gave them a promissory note secured by an instrument designated a “Real and Chattel Mortgage.” The property was listed therein under two heads. Under the heading of “Real Property” twenty-six mining claims were described. Under the heading of “Personal Property” the following: “All buildings, and improvements located on the above described property or that may be erected thereon, together with all and singular the appurtenances,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Winbigler v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Spaulding v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Syson v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gaskill v. NealIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Curtis v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Curtis v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.