Legal Opinion

Streit v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 2011No. 07-CT-788, 07-CT-789, 07-CT-790, 07-CT-805, 07-CT-806, 07-CT-807, 07-CT-808, 07-CT-809, 07-CT-810, 07-CT-811, 07-CT-812, 07-CT-822, 07-CT-823, 07-CT-849PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

The criminal charges lodged against the appellants in these fourteen consolidated appeals stem from their participation in demonstrations against the war in Iraq at the White House on March 16, 2007, and/or at the Cannon House Office Building on March 22, 2007. The demonstrations culminated in mass arrests. The appellants now before us were tried together with several other defendants in a single proceeding before the court without a jury. All the defendants were pro se. (A so-called “attorney-advisor” was present to offer them assistance, but he did not participate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington Mobilization Committee v. Maurice J. Cullinane, Chief of the Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. White House Vigil for the Era Committee v. William P. Clark, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. TETAZ v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Bloch v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ANTOINETTE BOLZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Price v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API