ANTOINETTE BOLZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Easterly, Associate Judge:
In the fall of 2011, Occupy D.C. protesters began demonstrating in McPherson Square, a federal park. For weeks, they remained there with the tacit, if not express, permission of the federal authorities. Then, one morning in early December, they assembled a wooden structure in the park, the “Occubarn.” The United States Park Police told the protesters to take it down. The protesters did not. After an all-day standoff, the police cleared the area of the Occubarn and tore it down. In the course of these events, the police arrested a number of protesters for failing to…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- J.P. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- James Allen Campbell v. UsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Flowers v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- McDuffie v. District of Columbia Board of ElectionsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.