Legal Opinion
TETAZ v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 2009No. 07-CT-140, 07-CT-141, 07-CT-262, 07-CT-271, 07-CT-272, 07-CT-273, 07-CT-284, 07-CT-285, 07-CT-410, 07-CT-434PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Senior Judge:
Following a bench trial, appellants were found guilty of offenses arising from their protest of the Iraq war on or near the grounds of the United States Capitol. Specifically, individual appellants were convicted of unlawful assembly1 or unlawfully crossing police lines2 during demonstrations at the Hart Senate Office Building, the Rayburn House Office Building, the Russell Senate Office Building, and the United States Capitol Building on successive days in September 2006. We affirm their convictions, summarizing the relevant facts as they pertain to each offense-situs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hampleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Daryl Agnew v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Rice v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- RICHARD Z. DUFFEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Streit v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.