Industrial Bank of Elizabeth City v. Resolute Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Three questions are to be answered in determining the correctness of the nonsuit.
In the first place, while the plaintiff’s mortgage, the policy in suit and the Williams mortgage all'bear date 6 January, 1941, it does not affirmatively appear that the Williams mortgage was in existence at the time of the issuance of the policy. Hence, on demurrer to the evidence, the question of concealment or misrepresentation concerning this mortgage would seem to be for the jury. Wells v. Ins. Co., 211 N. C., 427, 190 S. E., 744.
Secondly, as no provision was made by agreement in writing added to the policy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Roper v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Dozier v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Dixon v. . HorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Barlow v. City Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Bailey v. MichaelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.