State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
We have here for determination (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the cases to the jury, (2) the competency of evidence, particularly the confessions, and (3) the adequacy and correctness of the charge.
I. The Oases Against Thompson, Powell and Covington :
Specifically, the question posed by the demurrers 'is whether the evidence permits the inference that sufficient “force” was used to constitute rape. The prosecution says, “Yes”; the defendants say, “No.” Carnal knowledge of the prosecutrix by three of the defendants is admitted. If such knowledge were attained “forcibly and against…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
- State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.