Legal Opinion

Dozier v. . Wood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

Little can or need be added to wbat was said in the two opinions filed in the case of Peele v. Powell, 156 N. C., 553, 73 S. E., 234, on rehearing, 161 N. C., 50, 76 S. E., 698, on the difference between an original promise, which is not within the statute of frauds, and a superadded one, which is within the statute. C. S., 987. The difference in statement is clear enough. Difficulty often arises, however, in determining whether the evidence in a given case places it in the one category or the other. Gennett v. Lyerly, 207 N. C., 201, 176 S. E., 275; Garren v. Youngblood, 207 N.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Baker v. MALAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Balentine v. . GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API