Legal Opinion
Harrods Ltd. v. Sixty Internet Domain Names
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 27, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-262-APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRINKEMA, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion reports our findings of fact and conclusions of law in this in rem civil action, brought under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection 'Act (“ACPA”), 15 U.S.C.A. § 1125(d), et seq. (West Supp.2000). This action presents exceedingly unique factual circumstances because both the plaintiff, England-based Harrods Limited, and the registrant of the defendant Domain Names, Harrods (Buenos Aires) Limited, possess varying intellectual property rights in the name “Harrods.” The defendants, sixty Internet domain names, 1 were…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sara Lee Corporation v. Kayser-Roth CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain NamesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Daimlerchrysler v. The Net Inc., Keith Maydak Michael SussmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Cable News Network L.P., L.L.L.P. v. CNNews.comDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Ford Motor Co. v. Greatdomains. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.