Daimlerchrysler v. The Net Inc., Keith Maydak Michael Sussman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff DaimlerChrysler moved for summary judgment on its Anti-Cybers-quatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) claim, arguing that there was no genuine issue of material fact with respect to whether the defendants violated the ACPA by their registration of the domain name “foradodge.com.” The district court agreed and granted summary judgment to the plaintiff. The district court also permanently enjoined the defendants from any further use of the “foradodge” name, ordered that the “foradodge.com” domain name be transferred to the plaintiff, and struck the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Paccar Inc. v. Telescan Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Bosley Medical Institute, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Bosley Medical Group, S.C., an Illinois Corporation v. Michael Steven KremerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- DSPT International, Inc. v. NahumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- New World Solutions, Inc. v. NameMedia Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Maker's Mark Distillery, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.