Legal Opinion
Harrods Limited v. Sixty Internet Domain Names
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2002No. 00-2414, 01-1928PublishedCited by 743 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.
OPINION
MICHAEL, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a dispute over Internet domain names between two companies named “Harrods,” both with legitimate rights to the “Harrods” name in different parts of the world. The plaintiff, Harrods Limited (“Harrods UK”), is the owner of the well-known Harrods of London department store. The defendants are 60 Internet domain names (“Domain Names” or “Names”) registered in Herndon, Virginia, by Harrods…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by743 opinions
- American Chiropractic Ass'n v. Trigon Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Reinee Hildebrandt v. Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Richard LittleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- McCray v. Maryland Department of Transportation, Maryland Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
738 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.