Legal Opinion

Kinkel v. Chase

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1918No. 21,220PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Morris district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is a suit in the nature of a creditor’s bill. The court gave judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

On the 23d of June, 1915, a judgment was rendered in the district court of Morris county in an action on a promissory note against A. R. Kinkel, the plaintiff in the present suit, W. J. Kinkel, and Dyson Jackson, and the court made an order that if the judgment was paid by either of the Kinkels they should be subrogated to the rights of the plaintiff in the action. Later,, on July 17, A. R. Kinkel satisfied the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ervin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Poole v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Harris v. FrankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Manley v. Debentures "B" Liquidation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Lockwood v. Meade Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mullins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Schulenberg v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. MulichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Drainage District No. Three v. Riverside Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API