Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1965No. C.D. 2534PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Plaintiff’s protest seeks to have cat food classified as dog food under the eo nomine specification for dog food.

To rule on this claim, we are to decide what is comprehended in the Trade Agreement Supplementary to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 55816), by the paragraph 1558 enumeration of “dog food unfit for human consumption.” What does it mean? Does it include all articles which, in their condition as imported, might be used to feed dogs ? Or does it embrace only those articles that are customarily sold and used as dog food in the trade and commerce of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Hygeia Antiseptic Toothpick Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Goldfarb Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API