Legal Opinion

Goldfarb Novelty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 17, 1941No. C. D. 553PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This is an action to recover duties exacted by the collector at New York upon chinaware described upon the invoice as (“Souvenier ware”) Square plates Q%” “Bills Place,” No. 20/573.-The collector assessed duty thereon at 70 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen separate pieces under paragraph 212, Tariff Act of 1930, as decorated china tableware. The plaintiff claims that the articles are not tableware and therefore are not subject to duty at the specific rate of 10 cents per dozen separate pieces, and that duty is assessable thereon at only 70 per centum ad valorem under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ReddenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API