Legal Opinion

LaSala v. Bordier Et Cie

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 11, 2008No. 06-4323PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POLLAK, District Judge.

In this appeal, we are called upon to decide whether state-law aiding-and-abetting-breach-of-fiduciary duty claims, which have passed from a corporation to its bankruptcy estate to a trust, may be brought in federal court by the trustees of the trust notwithstanding the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLU-SA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78bb. We must further decide whether, under SLUSA, the trustees, as assignees of individual investors in the bankrupt enterprise, may assert, in federal court, against foreign entities, claims characterized as arising…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. William Hampton v. Pacific Investment ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. In Re Lord Abbett Mutual Funds Fee LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API