Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Teo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 10, 2014No. 12-1168PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
A jury concluded that defendants Alfred Teo and MAAA Trust were liable for violating (inter alia) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 13(d) and 10(b) (15 U.S.C. § 78m(d) and § 78j(b)). The District Court subsequently denied the Defendants’ motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. It also ordered (inter alia) the Defendants to disgorge over $17 million, plus prejudgment interest amounting to over $14 million. They now appeal alleging errors arising from the admission of certain evidence and the use of a general verdict…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- SEC v. GenAudio Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Kokesh v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- SEC v. Guy GentileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Abbvie Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.