Legal Opinion
Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 17, 2009No. 08-3576PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Daniel Segal challenges the district court’s dismissal of this class action, premised on state-law claims of breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract, against Fifth Third Bank and its holding company, Fifth Third Bancorp. Because the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”), Pub.L. No. 105-353, 112 Stat. 3227, bars Segal’s claims, we affirm.
I
Segal is a beneficiary of trust accounts formerly administered by Fifth Third. In 2007, he sued the Bank on behalf of himself, his children and “all beneficiaries of trust, estate, or other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ZandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ryan Rowinski, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., Ryan RowinskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- MITCHELL v. McNEILCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Marqus Stevenson v. City of Seat Pleasant, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Romano v. KazacosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jeffery Stanton v. Cory ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.