Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division ex rel. Husa v. Schofield

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1999No. S-8370PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*406 OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) appeals an order by the superior court reducing some of David Scho-field’s child support arrears to judgment. The superior court concluded that David and CSED had reached an agreement for David to pay a lower amount of monthly child support and accordingly reduced his arrearage. Because the superior court’s judgment was a retroactive modification of child support obligations prohibited by Alaska Civil Rule 90.3(h)(2), we reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

David L. Schofield and Karen A. Schofield (now Karen Husa) were…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Boone v. GipsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Monette v. HoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. M.R.S. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Yerrington v. YerringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Paxton v. GavlakAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Crumpler v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API