State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division ex rel. Husa v. Schofield
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*406 OPINION
2Per curiam
I. INTRODUCTION
The Alaska Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) appeals an order by the superior court reducing some of David Scho-field’s child support arrears to judgment. The superior court concluded that David and CSED had reached an agreement for David to pay a lower amount of monthly child support and accordingly reduced his arrearage. Because the superior court’s judgment was a retroactive modification of child support obligations prohibited by Alaska Civil Rule 90.3(h)(2), we reverse.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
David L. Schofield and Karen A. Schofield (now Karen Husa) were…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Boone v. GipsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Monette v. HoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- M.R.S. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Yerrington v. YerringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Geldermann v. GeldermannAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Paxton v. GavlakAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Crumpler v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.