Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic Development
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The State of Alaska, under authority of AS 43.70.075, administratively suspended Richard Godfrey’s authority to sell tobacco for sixty-five days and imposed civil fines because two of his employees had been convicted under AS 11.76.100(a)(1) of negligently selling cigarettes to minors. The question here is whether it was a denial of Godfrey’s due process rights to impose these civil penalties against Godfrey without permitting him to dispute in the administrative proceedings whether his employees had been negligent. Because even a conviction “by plea”…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frost v. SpencerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Foondle v. O'BrienAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Frost v. SpencerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Holiday Alaska, Inc. v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.