Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic Development

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2007No. S-11894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The State of Alaska, under authority of AS 43.70.075, administratively suspended Richard Godfrey’s authority to sell tobacco for sixty-five days and imposed civil fines because two of his employees had been convicted under AS 11.76.100(a)(1) of negligently selling cigarettes to minors. The question here is whether it was a denial of Godfrey’s due process rights to impose these civil penalties against Godfrey without permitting him to dispute in the administrative proceedings whether his employees had been negligent. Because even a conviction “by plea”…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frost v. SpencerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Foondle v. O'BrienAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Frost v. SpencerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Holiday Alaska, Inc. v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API