Legal Opinion

Paxton v. Gavlak

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2004No. S-10607PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A 1989 court order required David Paxton to pay substantial monthly child support. He accrued large arrearages, and the Aaska Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) sought consolidation of his debt into a single judgment. In January 1997 CSED began an administrative review of his financial circumstances, and he provided CSED with information that, if correct, required a substantial reduction in his monthly obligation. In November 1999 he asked the superior court to reduce his payments. The court reduced his payments, but only from November 1999…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Dunn v. DunnAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Jaymot v. Skillings-DonatAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Schmidt v. KoivistoAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Copeland v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Shepherd v. HaralovichAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API