Legal Opinion

Pontecorvo v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1928No. Docket No. 3582PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of his minor daughter, Clelia Pontecorvo, alleged to have been directly caused by the negligence of the defendant. The issues of fact were tried by a jury, and a verdict arrived at and returned in favor of the defendant. Judgment was entered accordingly. A motion for a new trial was made by the plaintiff and denied. This appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment.

The death of the minor child named in the complaint occurred in Lincoln Park, Los Angeles, on the twentieth day of November, 1924, between the hours of 8 and 9…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Coughlan v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  3. Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Pointer v. Mountain Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Columbia Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ireland v. MarsdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Brown v. Winwood Amusement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Johnston v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. McIntyre v. Smoke Tree Ranch StablesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API