Rolland v. Primesource Staffing, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Ronnie Rolland seeks leave from this court to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R.App. P. 24. He wishes to appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees (collectively, “Prime-source”) on his claim that Primesource discriminatorily terminated his employment based upon his race, in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981.
Before considering Rolland’s Rule 24 motion, we first address our authority to entertain it in light of apparently contrary statutory language in 28…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert L. Baugh v. Joe Max Taylor Eric Nevelow Perry EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Dorothy Floyd v. United States Postal Service, Donald Harants, PostmasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Callihan v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Orbain Owens v. George KeelingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Wooten v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
3Cited by44 opinions
- Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- O'NEAL v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Spearman v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Boling-Bey v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.