Legal Opinion

Rolland v. Primesource Staffing, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2007No. 06-1491PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Ronnie Rolland seeks leave from this court to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R.App. P. 24. He wishes to appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees (collectively, “Prime-source”) on his claim that Primesource discriminatorily terminated his employment based upon his race, in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Before considering Rolland’s Rule 24 motion, we first address our authority to entertain it in light of apparently contrary statutory language in 28…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert L. Baugh v. Joe Max Taylor Eric Nevelow Perry EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Dorothy Floyd v. United States Postal Service, Donald Harants, PostmasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Callihan v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Orbain Owens v. George KeelingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Wooten v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. O'NEAL v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Spearman v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Boling-Bey v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API