Legal Opinion
Callihan v. Schneider
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1999No. 98-6077PublishedCited by 295 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge.
Walter Callihan, a pro se Kentucky resident, appeals a district court order denying his motion to appeal in forma pauperis. We address Callihan’s appeal because recent amendments to Fed. R.App. P. 24 require us to modify our decision in Floyd v. United States Postal Sew., 105 F.3d 274 (6th Cir.1997).
Seeking monetary relief, Callihan sued a county prosecutor and a state police detective alleging that they engaged in a conspiracy to entrap Callihan and charge him with attempting to bribe a public official. The district court subsequently dismissed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dorothy Floyd v. United States Postal Service, Donald Harants, PostmasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by295 opinions
- Callihan v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Orbain Owens v. George KeelingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Shamaeizadeh v. CuniganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Ronald Post v. Margaret BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Rolland v. Primesource Staffing, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.