Legal Opinion

Boling-Bey v. U.S. Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 18, 2009No. 08-3166PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND ORDER REQUIRING COMPLETION OF IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

The matter before the court is the “Reply Motion to the Court’s Inquiry of Completion of In Forma Pauperis Application” (Response) filed by pro se appellant Oliver Boling-Bey, a federal prisoner. The Response addresses our Order Requiring Completion of In Forma Pauperis Application, filed December 9, 2008 (First Order). In that Order, we directed Boling-Bey to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement in support of his Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Costs or Fees (ifp…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re Prison Litigation Reform ActCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Mitchell v. FarcassCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Birch v. Atchison, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  2. Budiono v. BarrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Grimes v. TCF BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Guebara (ID 40223) v. BascueDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  5. Hall v. TrumpDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API