Legal Opinion
Boothby v. Atlas Mechanical, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1992No. C009284PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
Paid vacation provided by an employment agreement vests as the employee labors. (Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 774, 779 [183 Cal.Rptr. 846, 647 P.2d 122, 33 A.L.R.4th 254].) Because vested vacation is nonforfeitable, an employer must compensate the employee for all vested vacation time remaining unused at termination. (Id. at p. 781; Lab. Code, § 227.3; further statutory references are to the Labor Code.) However, an employment agreement may provide that the employee does not earn additional paid vacation if a specified amount of vested vacation remains…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Wil-Low CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Connolly v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Wilkerson v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Tudor Ranches, Inc. v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Steinhebel v. Los Angeles Times CommunicationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Choate v. Celite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Church v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.