Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.
The parties will here after be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.
This action is founded upon the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A., §51 et seq.
Upon the motion of the plaintiff below, the trial court instructed the jury that plaintiff had established liability of the defendant, thus leaving solely to'the jury the question of whether the proof submitted established defendant’s plea of contributory negligence; and the further question as to the amount of' plaintiff’s recovery.
The jury returned its verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon which judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fletcher v. Meadow Gold CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MarzuolaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MeansDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1966
- Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.