Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Means
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 16, 1966No. Civ. No. 6122PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The Court submitted this case to the jury on a single interrogatory with the verdict based thereon. The interrogatory was: “Was Terry Lynn Duff a resident of the same household as Ermal Duff on February 21, 1960?” The answer of the jury was yes.
At the close of the evidence the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict. This motion was denied. After judgment was entered based on the foregoing interrogatory, answer and verdict the plaintiff has filed a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and a Motion for New Trial. These motions are now under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Valta Sue Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Appleton v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Raymond v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. MattoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- George Maurice Hamilton and Barbara Jane Lawson v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Pardue v. Citizens Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Tirona v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993