Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Parrish

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1959No. 38346Published

1Opinion of the Court

344 P.2d 658 (1959)

Roy E. HANNA, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

G.Y. PARRISH and Guy E. Clark, co-partners, dba Parrish & Clark, Defendants in Error.

No. 38346.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

September 29, 1959.

A.A. Berringer, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Smith & Townsend, by Bruce M. Townsend, Tulsa, for defendants in error.

2Per curiam

This is an action on a note and chattel mortgage, brought by G.Y. Parrish and Guy E. Clark, co-partners, doing business as Parrish & Clark, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, against Roy E. Hanna, hereafter referred to as defendant.

This is the second appeal in this case. As shown by our…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ZobischSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API