Legal Opinion

Demes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 18, 2002No. 00-471TPublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This tax ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under RCFC 12(b)(1) or for failure to state a claim under RCFC 12(b)(4). Defendant’s motion raises as its principal issue whether plaintiffs’ claim for a refund is barred by the statute of limitations because the carryback for losses that plaintiffs claim is predicated on a personal nonbusiness debt, which carries a shorter limitations period than a business debt. Specifically, defendant argues that plaintiffs’ status as shareholders does not allow them to claim a loss on a bad…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Mastrolia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API