Legal Opinion

State v. Trantham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1949PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakNhill, J.

The defendant concedes tbat tbe warrant properly charges the alleged offense and that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict. He preserves and brings forward only those exceptions which are directed to his contention that the ordinance is unconstitutional and void for that it is arbitrary, unreasonable, and discriminatory, and unlawfully deprives him of his rights, liberties, and freedoms guaranteed by the due process clause of the U. S. Constitution and by N. 0. Constitution, Art. I, see. 17.

The Attorney-General challenges the right of this defendant to assail the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Still v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. In Re the Appeal of MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. High Point Surplus Company v. PleasantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API