Krebs v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowlek, J.
The workmen’s compensation act provides that an employee is. entitled to compensation • when at the time of the accident he is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment; and that an employee going to or from his employment in the ordinary and usual way, while on the premises of the employer, shall be deemed' to be performing such service. Sec. 102.03, Stats.
The employee was going to work in his ordinary and usual way. The sole question is whether he was on the employer’s premises when injured.
The facts of the case being undisputed, the question whether the point of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. RutzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Northwestern Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Hornburg v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Caravella v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frisbie v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Flodin v. Henry & Wright Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- E. W. Hallet Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Gunderson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.