Gunderson v. Industrial Commission

The sole question in this case is whether the facts are such as to bring into operation sec. 102.03 (1) (b), Stats. 1931, which provides:

“. • . Every employee going to and from his employment in the ordinary and usual way, while on the premises of his employer, shall be deemed to be performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment,”

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff’s intestate was employed by Oscar Grant, who had a contract with the state of Wisconsin to pave Tower avenue in the city of Superior. At the time the contract was executed this street had two strips of…