Legal Opinion
State v. Courtney
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 2004No. A03-790, A03-791PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal from convictions and sentences for two second-degree assaults arising out of separate incidents. On appeal from his conviction and sentence for the assault against his former girlfriend, Courtney argues that the district court abused its discretion by (1) admitting the hearsay statements of his former girlfriend and her six-year-old daughter, (2) denying his request for a continuance where his newly retained attorney had only a day to prepare for trial, and (3) granting the state’s challenge for cause of a juror who indicated skepticism of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. MacKOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ScacchettiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. CoonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.