Legal Opinion
State v. Scacchetti
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 2005No. A03-301PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Anthony Phillip Scacchetti challenges his convictions, for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, malicious punishment of a child, and third-degree assault, arguing under the Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), his constitutional right of confrontation was violated by the admission of a child accuser’s out-of-court- statements to a nurse practitioner. We affirm.
FACTS
In May 2002, Scacchetti began babysitting for his girlfriend’s three-year-old daughter, R.J., while his girlfriend,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.