Legal Opinion

Lash v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1977No. 76-1027PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of .the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Civ. R. 3(A) provides that “[a] civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court, if service is obtained within one year from such filing.” (Emphasis added.)

The first paragraph of the syllabus in Mason v. Waters (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 212, reads:

“Within the meaning of Section 2305.17, Revised Code [similar to Civ. R. 3(A)], as it read prior to amendment effective October 30, 1965, the filing of a petition and pre-cipe for the issuance of summons does not constitute the commencement of an action or an attempt to commence an action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mason v. WatersOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Farmers Market Drive-In Shopping Ctrs. v. Magana, 06ap-532 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Pippin v. M.A. Hauser Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. McAbee v. MerrymanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Sorrell v. Estate of DatkoOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API