Cameron v. Haas Bros. Packing Co.
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Mobile Oity Court. Heard before Hon. O. J. Síemmes. Assumpsit by Haas. Bros. Packing Company against Florence M. Cameron. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Mobile Oity Court. Heard before Hon. O. J. Síemmes. Assumpsit by Haas. Bros. Packing Company against Florence M. Cameron. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. The promise, if made, was within the statute of frauds. — Poke v. Wilson, 127 Ala. 240. The party has the right to request instructions to the jury based upon hypotheses which the evidence in his favor tends to establish.- — Oriol v. Marks, 51 Ala. 566; Bibb v. Mitchell, 58 Ala. 657; Bates v. Hart, 124 Ala. 427. The court did not err in refusing charge 8 requested by the defendant. — Clark v. Jones, 87 Ala. 474;…
1Opinion of the Court
db GBAFFENRIED, J.
It appears from the evidence in this case that the New Waldorf Cafe was furnished a lot of meat by the appellee at various times during the years 1910 and 1911, and that the meats so furnished the cafe were charged on the books of appellee to the New Waldorf Cafe. It further appears that the appellant is the mother of O. S. Cameron, and that some time in the early part of the year 1910 the said C. S. Cameron bought the New Waldorf Cafe from its then proprietor, and continued the business until shortly before this suit was brought. C. SL Cameron appears to have been the only…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Jones & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Webb v. Hawkins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Pake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Smith Bros. & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Fuller v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collier v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Day v. AdcockAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
- Shepherd v. ClementsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Shepherd v. ClementsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931